Subscribe
Guest Perspective · Curated

Navigating Virtual Prescribing Policy Changes in 2025

A practitioner perspective by Dr. Tom Milam, Chief Medical Officer, Iris Telehealth.

The argument

Telehealth prescribing has expanded access, especially for addiction treatment and rural patients, but DEA flexibility expirations create dangerous uncertainty. Regulators, providers, and patients must collaborate on permanent frameworks that keep virtual prescribing accessible while protecting safety.

Why we picked it

The HTC editorial desk curates practitioner perspectives that pass a simple test: would a health system executive, product leader, or investor act differently after reading it? This piece by Dr. Tom Milam earns its place - it comes from the operating trenches of policy & regulation, not the conference stage, and it takes a position specific enough to disagree with.

The bigger picture

The AI adoption question runs through every executive conversation in 2026. The evidence base is finally arriving: the largest controlled study of ambient documentation, published in JAMA, found clinicians saved 16 minutes of documentation time per day - but only a third of users hit the usage threshold for maximum benefit (our coverage). Meanwhile Rock Health has stopped labeling AI as a differentiator at all, because every company claims it - which is exactly why operating discipline of the kind described here separates winners from demo-ware.

Read it alongside our own reporting in Policy & Regulation, where the data behind this debate is covered daily on the HTC Wire.

Author & publication credit. This is HealthTech Cube's editorial summary of a guest article written by Dr. Tom Milam, Chief Medical Officer, Iris Telehealth and first published by MedCity News (December 2024). The argument and all underlying ideas belong to the author; the full original piece, which we recommend reading, is available at MedCity News ↗. This page contains our own summary and commentary, not a reproduction of the original work.